检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡德鑫[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学,北京100084
出 处:《现代教育管理》2017年第3期16-23,共8页Modern Education Management
摘 要:以国际公认程度较高的QS、THE、USNEWS和ARWU四大排名作为基础,从横向、纵向和单项指标三个方面系统研究我国C9高校的表现,同时运用DEA分析方法对中外一流高校的学术竞争力(科研绩效)进行对比,结果表明:经过多年发展C9高校综合实力取得显著进步,但与世界一流大学尚有不小差距;C9高校存在高水平论文不足以及论文篇均被引数较低、师资建设投入匮乏、国际合作质量有待提高等问题。世界一流高校的学术竞争力显著高于我国高校,其科研总体效率、规模效率均较高;C9高校的科研资源利用效率尚有提升的空间。在以质量治理为核心的改革进程中,我国推进世界一流大学建设任重道远。Based on QS, THE, USNEWS and ARWU which are internationally recognized, the research, from the aspects of lateral, longitudinal and single parameter, studies the performance of C9 college in China, and makes a comparison of academic competitiveness between the Chinese and foreign first-class universities by using DEA analysis method. The findings are as follows: the comprehensive strength of C9 college has made remarkable progress after years of development, but there is still a big gap with world-class universities; there are several problems existing in C9, such as the shortage and low citation of high level research papers, inadequate investment on teachers construction, low quality of international cooperation and so on. The academic competitiveness of the world-class universities is significantly higher than that of our country. The overall efficiency and scale efficiency of the scientific research is higher, and the utilization efficiency of the scientific research resources of C9 university has the space to improve.Therefore, in the reform process of "taking the quality management as the core", China has a long way to go to promote the construction of a world-class university.
关 键 词:一流大学 大学排名 学术竞争力 科研绩效 质量治理
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28