感染性休克患者综合干预效果评价分析  

Intervention effect evaluation on septic shock patients carrying out comprehensive intervention

作　　者：黄丹红 姚丽萍 尚琴芬 

机构地区：[1]台州恩泽医疗中心路桥医院急诊科,318050

出　　处：《中国医院统计》2017年第1期27-29,共3页Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics

基　　金：台州市路桥区科技局课题(2013A23008)

摘　　要：目的探讨综合干预措施对感染性休克患者的干预效果。方法选取84例感染性休克患者随机分为对照组和干预组,各42例;对照组给予常规护理措施,而干预组给予综合护理干预措施,比较两组的休克持续时间、使用呼吸机时间、MODS发生率、住院时间、临床满意度、总有效率等指标。结果干预组经过综合干预后,其休克持续时间、使用呼吸机时间、MODS发生率、住院时间均明显低于对照组(P<0.05);干预组临床满意率为90.5%(38/42),高于对照组的59.5%(25/42,P<0.01);干预组的临床总有效率为88.1%(37/42),高于对照组的66.7%(28/42,P<0.05)。结论感染性休克患者实施综合干预措施后,可明显改善患者病情,提高临床疗效和临床满意度,缩短住院时间。Objective To explore the intervention effect of septic shock patients carrying out comprehensive intervention measures. Methods Eighy-four septic shock patients were randomly divided into control group and intervention group, respec- tively 42 cases. The control group was given usual care measures, while the intervention group was carried out comprehensive nursing intervention measures. The indexes of persistence time of septic shock, use length of breathing machine, incidence rate of MODS, length of stay in hospital, clinical satisfaction degree and total effective rate were compared between the two groups. Results The indexes of persistence time of septic shock, use length of breathing machine, incidence rate of MODS, length of stay in hospital of the intervention group were much less than those of the control group（ P〈0.05 ）. The satisfaction rate of the in- tervention group was 90.5 % （38/42）, much higher than that of the control group （25/42 （59.5 % ）, P〈0.01 ）. The total effec- tive rate of the intervention group was 88.1% （ 37/42 ）, much better than that of the control group （ 66.7% （ 28/42 ）, P〈0.05 ）. Conclusion The carrying out of comprehensive nursing intervention measures for septic shock patients might obviously improve patient＇s condition, raise clinical curative effect and treatment satisfaction degree, and cut down length of stay in hospital.

关 键 词：感染性休克 干预 干预效果 效果评价 

分 类 号：R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]