检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈书睿[1] CHEN Shurui(School of Economic and Management,Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, Chin)
出 处:《西安体育学院学报》2017年第2期147-157,共11页Journal of Xi'an Physical Education University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(12CTY022)
摘 要:包括中国在内的世界各国、国际组织都努力采取法律的手段试图遏制兴奋剂在体育中的使用,在这个过程中逐步形成了一系列的反兴奋剂法律制度。创制这些反兴奋剂法律制度的主体主要包括国际奥委会、国际单项体育联合会、联合国教科文组织、国际体育仲裁庭和各国政府。由它们所创制的反兴奋剂法律制度主要有兴奋剂违规行为种类、兴奋剂犯罪制度、反兴奋剂教育制度、反兴奋剂处罚机制和兴奋剂纠纷解决机制等。研究旨在为我国反兴奋剂法律的完善提供很好的借鉴。Many countries including China and international organizations have tried to take legal means to try to deter and prevent doping,and thus gradually forming a series of Anti-doping legal systems. The bodies that developed those systems are International Olympic Committee,the International Sports Federation,United Nations Educational Scientific and Culture Organization,Court of Arbitration for Sports and national governments. The anti-doping legal systems created mainly include the types of doping violations,the doping-crime system,the anti-doping education system,the anti-doping punishment mechanism and the doping dispute resolution mechanism. This research may provide a good reference for the improvement of antidoping law in China.
分 类 号:D912.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222