检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雁[1] 耿晓静[1] 林静[1] 孙艳军[1] 赵亮[1] 代丽红[1]
机构地区:[1]承德医学院附属医院神经内科,河北承德067000
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2017年第5期937-939,977,共4页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基 金:河北省科学技术厅科技计划项目(15277752D);承德市科学技术局科技支撑计划项目(201121051)
摘 要:目的:探讨神经内科危重患者院内转运中的安全隐患和不同转运流程的应用效果。方法:选取2010年1月-2014年12月入住我院神经内科需转运的1000例神经系统疾病患者为研究对象,随机分为对照组500例,观察组500例,对照组进行常规转运,观察组采用系统化转运的方式进行转运,比较两组患者的安全隐患发生率和转运各个步骤合格率。结果:观察组的安全隐患总发生率明显低于对照组,转运各个步骤的总合格率也高于对照组(P<0.05),差异显著,具有统计学意义。结论:系统化转运可以有效提升转运各个步骤合格率,控制神经内科危重患者院内转运中的安全隐患,因此其应用价值相对更高。Objective: To study the safety hazards and investigate the application effect of different transport processes of critical patients in Department of Neurology during intrahospital transport. Methods: 1000 patients with nervous system diseases in Department of Neurology who needed intrahospital transport from January 2010 to December 2014 were selected as the research objects and they were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 500 cases each group. The patients in control group were given with conventional transport, and the patient in observation group were accepted with system transport, then the safety hazards rates and all steps qualified rates of two groups were compared. Results: The total rate of safety hazards of observation group was obviously lower than that of control group, and the qualified rates of all steps were all higher than those of control group, and the differences of two groups were statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusions: The system transport can effectively improve the steps qualified rate in all transported steps and control the safety hazards of critical patients in Department of Neurology during intrahospital transport, so its application value is relatively higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222