分理、分离、独立——民事抗诉特别程序的立场及路径  

Reasong Separating,Subject Indepent and Procedure Special——The Position and The Path of Constructing Civil Protest Special Procedure

作　　者：许尚豪[1] 康健[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2017年第2期164-173,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国目前所实行私益救济型的民事抗诉程序,将抗诉异化为私益再审的程序启动方式。此种模式在压缩抗诉监督功能运行空间的同时,亦使抗诉无法摆脱私益救济的羁绊,导致监督功能依附于救济功能,抗诉的独立价值颇受置疑。为改变此种局面,应当使民事抗诉彻底回归纯粹的法律监督立场,摈弃现有的借助私益救济审理程序的作法,建立起与监督功能相契合的包括案件来源、启动、审理等内容在内的民事抗诉特别程序。Currently civil protest system of China is built to protect private interests,and the protest is disassimilated to be a startup of retrial procedure. This model reduces the supervision function of protest,meanwhile it makes the protest can＇t get rid of the constraint of private interests＇ relief,leading to the supervision function attached to the relief function.In order to change this situation,the civil protest procedure should return to the position of legal supervision thoroughly,abandoning the procedure of private interest relieving,and to set up a complete system corresponding to the supervision function,including cases＇ source,procedure＇s startup and trial procedure.

关 键 词：民事抗诉 抗诉事由 抗诉主体 特别程序 

分 类 号：DF2[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]