嵇阮优劣论  

A Comparative Study of Ji Kang and Ruan Ji

作　　者：叶当前[1] 

机构地区：[1]安庆师范大学文学院,安徽安庆246011

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第2期110-117,共8页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目"东亚<诗品><文心雕龙>文献研究集成"(14ZDB068)

摘　　要："竹林七贤"核心人物嵇康、阮籍并称"嵇阮",《文心雕龙》以两者并驰文路,对举品评,确立嵇阮在文学史上的重要地位;历代文学史家评嵇阮为"正始体代表""正始文坛双子星座"等,品骘评析,不分轩轾。钟嵘《诗品》以五言诗成就置嵇阮于不同品第,嵇阮诗文优劣遂成为诗文评的一大公案,宋代以后思想文化界更在政治立场、道德人格层面评论嵇阮,或因处世而抑阮扬嵇,或以同情而发掘嗣宗隐忧,嵇阮优劣论在中国思想史上留下了清晰的轨迹。探究嵇阮优劣论原因,嵇阮并称最早当源于竹林名士内部,并举评析,渊源有自;嵇、阮诗文拔出流俗,并举优劣,符合文学自身发展规律。Ji Kang and Ruan Ji were the center of ＂the seven sages in bamboo groves＂. They were highly spoken of in the history of literature in Wen Xin Diao Long （The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon）. Their literary works were called Zheng Shi style by the literary historians. Since Zhong Rong＇s Grades of Poetry put them in different grades based on the achievements of their five-character poetry, the debate on the reputation of Ji Kang and Ruan Ji have become a big issue. The scholars have evaluated Ji Kang and Ruan Ji from the political standpoint and moral personality since the Song Dynasty. Some depreciated Ruan, while others understood and sympathized with him. The seven sages in bamboo groves held that Ji Kang and Ruan Ji should be put in the same rank, for both of their literary achievements were outstanding. The debate on the reputation of Ji Kang and Ruan Ji was consistent with the development of literature.

关 键 词：嵇阮优劣论 并称 文心雕龙 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]