检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江广川工程咨询有限公司,浙江杭州310020 [2]浙江省水利河口研究院,浙江杭州310020
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2017年第8期217-220,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:浙江省科技计划项目(2014F50016)
摘 要:以位于钱塘江上游的姚家枢纽为例,分析了不同防渗方案对浸没区水利枢纽附近浸没和渗流的影响,发现沿库岸布置防渗措施与垂直库岸布置防渗措施对比,可以明显降低枢纽附近的浸润面,降低发生浸没的可能,并能降低上游侧高水位发生渗透破坏的可能。建议浸没区水利枢纽采用沿库岸方向布置防渗措施,以防止发生浸没和渗透破坏。Taking Yaojia Project in the upper reaches of Qiantang River as an example,the influence of different seepage control schemes on immersion and seepage was analyzed.It was found that the seepage control measures along the bank of the reservoir and the seepage control measures of the vertical reservoir bank can obviously reduce the infiltration surface near the junction,to reduce the possibility of the occurrence of immersion,and to reduce the high water level in the upper reaches of the seepage damage.The seepage control measures were suggested to arrange along the direction of the reservoir bank to prevent the infiltration and infiltration.
分 类 号:S29[农业科学—农业水土工程] TV82[农业科学—农业工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117