方法论整体主义在公害犯罪因果关系认定中的应用  

The Application of Methodological Holism in the Identification of the Causation of the Offence of Public Hazards

作　　者：陈文昊 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京10071

出　　处：《河北北方学院学报（社会科学版）》2017年第1期74-80,共7页Journal of Hebei North University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：公害犯罪无法通过传统教义体系对其因果关系加以证明。传统理论上以"条件公式"为核心的因果律体系站在方法论个体主义的立场之上,判定特定行为与结果之间是否具有"引起与被引起"的关系。它强调异常介入因素的切断作用,忽视对社会意义的考察,并且在很多情况下无法得到现有科技的切实证明。方法论整体主义视野下的"盖然性归责"将视角从切实作用转移到对"盖然性"的考察,对引发结果具有最高盖然性的个体加以归责。方法论整体主义视野下的"整体归责"先确立承担责任的整体,而后在内部解决个体责任分配的问题,在公害犯罪的问题上更好地回应了刑事政策的要求。The causation of the offence of tional dogmatic methods. The traditional law public hazards is hard to be identified and explained by tradi- of causation is based on methodological individualism to judge if the specific act has the relationship of＂causing or being caused＇with the result. It emphasizes the cut-off of causation by irregular factors and ignores the social meaning and cannot be proved by present technolo- gy. From the angle of＂probability causation＇in methodological holism, the object to be observed is shifted from true effect to probability. The＂integral causation＇in methodological holism firstly identifies the whole bearer of the responsibility, and then distributes the responsibility among individuals. The methodological holism in the identification of the causation of the offence of public hazards meets the requirements of the criminal policy.

关 键 词：公害犯罪 条件公式 盖然性 整体归责 

分 类 号：D920.4[政治法律—法学]