检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦树旺[1] 韦廷求[1] 黄宏坤[1] 韦文葵[1] 韦张旭
机构地区:[1]河池市第三人民医院重症医学科,广西547000
出 处:《中国临床新医学》2017年第3期261-264,共4页CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
摘 要:目的应用Utstein模式评价院内不同病房心脏骤停患者实施心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CPR)的效果。方法收集2013-01~2014-07在该院普通病房、重症监护病房(intensive care unit,ICU)发生心脏骤停并实施CPR的患者130例,根据Utstein模式指南给予注册登记分为普通病房组(92例)和ICU组(38例)进行对比分析。结果 ICU组自主循环恢复百分比(26.31%)与普通病房组(14.13%)比较,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=2.742,P=0.098)。ICU组存活出院、存活半年、一年百分比(依序为18.42%、13.15%、10.52%)高于普通病房组(依序为6.52%、1.86%、1.86%),差异均有统计学意义(χ~2=4.231,P=0.040;χ~2=8.901,P=0.030;χ~2=6.479,P=0.010)。结论 ICU发生心脏骤停并CPR存活出院率、出院后半年及1年生存率比普通病房高,提示在ICU对心脏骤停患者实施CPR效果较好。Objective To evaluate the outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation( CPR) in the patients with sudden cardiac arrest in different places of the hospital settings. Methods One hundred and thirty patients with sudden cardiac arrest were collected from January 2013 to July 2014 in the general ward and intensive care unit( ICU) of our hospital and were divided into the general ward group( n = 92) and the ICU group( n = 38) according to the Utstein guidelines. The clinical date were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation( ROSC) between the general ward group and the ICU group( 14. 13% vs 26. 31%,χ~2= 2. 742,P = 0. 098). The hospital discharge rate,the half year survival rate and oneyear survival rate in the ICU group were significantly elevated than those in the general ward group( 18. 42% vs6. 52%,χ~2= 4. 231,P = 0. 040; 13. 15% vs 1. 86%,χ~2= 8. 901,P = 0. 030; 10. 52% vs 1. 86%,χ~2= 6. 479,P =0. 010). Conclusion The clinical effects of CPR in the ICU are better than those in the general ward in the patients with sudden cardiac arrest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222