检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩超[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2017年第1期73-80,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:当今社会中,个人肖像极易在未经肖像权人同意的情况下被非法用于商业推广宣传之中,对此构建合理的肖像权商品化救济机制尤为必要。本文将肖像权的权利救济立足于一体化的保护模式,运用推定的方式对权利人所遭受的经济损失和精神损害加以认定。在请求经济损失赔偿时,肖像权人可以根据所受损失和侵权人所获利益的大小,分别适用侵权损害赔偿请求权、不当得利请求权或者获利返还请求权。在确定精神损害赔偿时,要考虑抚慰金的功能并结合《精神损害赔偿司法解释》第10条的考量因素加以确定,但侵权人获利不宜作为精神损害赔偿数额的考量因素。In today's society, personal portrait is extremely easy to be used in commercial promotion illegally without the consent of the portrait right holder. It's essential to construct the portrait relief mechanism. This paper proposed to protect the rights comprehensively, using the way of presumption to identify the economic losses and mental damage of the right holders. When the right holders claim the compensation for economic losses, compensation for infringement of damages, unjust enrichment or profit return can be applied based on the amount of their economic losses and the interest of the infringer obtained. When identifying the compensation of mental damage, we need to take the consoling function of compensation into account, combining with factors in article 10 of Judicial Interpretation on Compensation for Mental Damage. While the profit obtained by infringer should not be accounted.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188