检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段磊[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]武汉大学两岸及港澳法制研究中心
出 处:《台海研究》2017年第1期41-51,共11页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies
基 金:2016年度中国法学会部级涉台专项课题"新形势下‘法理台独’在立法;司法;执法及政策中的表现及对策研究"(CLS(2016)STZX05);中国博士后基金第60批面上资助项目"运用法治资源维护和巩固‘一中框架’的策略体系研究"(2016M600606)的阶段性成果
摘 要:"释宪台独"是指台湾地区具有"释宪权"的司法机关通过极其隐晦的方式,借助司法个案对现行"宪法"进行违背"两岸同属一个中国"事实的解释,通过大量法律辞藻的包装推动"台独"的活动。基于台湾地区"释宪"机制和对岛内政治格局的综合分析,本文研判未来民进党当局通过个案解释的方法推动"释宪台独"的可能性较大,可能在2019年"司法院"第二轮人事变动后开始推动"释宪台独"活动。大陆方面应充分重视"释宪台独"对两岸关系发展的危害性,借助释宪、释法和司法审判活动等法治方式,形成应对"释宪台独"的法治策略体系。"Taiwan Independence by Constitutional Interpretations" refers to the intent and moves of the judicial authorities in Taiwan to promote "Taiwan Independence" by the implicit approach of exploiting individual cases to interpret the prevailing "constitution" in Taiwan in ways that are counter to the fact that both sides across the Taiwan Strait belong to one China. Through a comprehensive a nalysis o political f the mechanisms for "constitutional interpretations" of the judicial authorities as well as the spectrum in Taiwan, this article concludes that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) authorities are very likely to adopt such an approach to promote "Taiwan Independence" after the second round of personnel shifts of the "Judicial Yuan" in 2019. In this regard, the Chinese main land must keep alert to the hazards of the DPP moves and construct an effective legalgang strategic framework to tackle them by such legal approaches as interpreting the Constitution and related laws as well as taking other judicial actions.
关 键 词:“释宪台独” “法理台独” “司法院” 两岸关系
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D618[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222