论WTO反倾销法视角下中国的市场经济地位问题——兼论《中国入世议定书》第15条的解释  

Discussion on China's Market Economy Status Under WTO Anti-Dumping Law-Review on the Interpretation of Article 15 of Protocol on the Accession of the People's Republic of China

作　　者：张建[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《西安电子科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期128-134,共7页Journal of Xidian University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：2015年度北京仲裁委员会科研基金项目"国际商事仲裁证据规则的制定与适用问题研究"(项目编号:201510);2015年度中国政法大学研究生精品课程项目"国际私法著作精读"(项目编号:YJPXC06)

摘　　要：中国的市场经济地位问题直接关系到在WTO反倾销程序中认定正常价值的方法。自中国加入WTO以来,考虑到《中国入世议定书》第15条的妥协,中国长期被视为非市场经济国家,以至于中国出口企业被其他成员方采取替代方法认定正常价值,并被征收高幅度反倾销税。从《中国入世议定书》第15条的解释出发,15年期满后应终止对华的非市场经济地位待遇,这一说法具备合理性;从中国经济体制改革的现实考察,以国有企业问题为例,中国的市场经济条件已经成就。基于法律与经济的双重考量,其他成员方在2016年后继续将中国视为非市场经济国家不具备充分合理性。China＇s market economy status is related to the the method to determine normal value during the process of WTO anti-dumping. Since China has accessed into WTO, considering the concession in the Article 15 of Protocol on the Accession of the People＇s Republic of China, other countries always consider China as a non-market economy country. As a result, they use alternative methods to determine normal value, and impose high anti-dumping duties. On the interpretation of Article 15 of Protocol on the Accession of the People＇s Republic of China, it is reasonable to expire after 15 years and other members should not consider China as a non-market economy country. Considering China＇s economic systematic reform, taking SOEs as an example, China has already satisfied the requirements of MES. Based on the dual considerations of law and economy, other members should not consider China as an NME after December 2016.

关 键 词：市场经济 反倾销 替代国价格 中国入世议定书 

分 类 号：F123.9[经济管理—世界经济]