游走于虚构与史实之间:《李娃传》辨疑二则  

The Two Textual Tests into the Novel—A Biography of Li Wa

作　　者：李沛[1] LI Pei(Faculty of Arts, Henan University, Kaifeng475001, Henan, China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学文学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《安康学院学报》2017年第2期47-50,55,共5页Journal of Ankang University

摘　　要：采用文史互证的方法,发现《李娃传》有与史实不相合之处,这显示了小说艺术虚构的特性。但是又有与史实相合者,显示了唐传奇"史笔"之特色。根据传中显示的时间推测,荥阳生应直言极谏科当在747年—775年间,但考《登科记考》发现无有合者,故荥阳生不可能应直言极谏科。"荥阳公"为郑姓有很大可能性,但亦无法确定;"荥阳公"在《唐阙史》中出现三次,不专指一人,因此难以确指荥阳公其人。This paper used the method of ＂mutual reflection of literature and history＂, and found that A Biography of Li Wa was different from histroy in some respects. This phenomenon reflected that fiction was not exactly true, but we can also find that many things were true. Accroding to time, we can think that Xingyang sheng attended imperial examinations between 747 to 775. But we can＇ t find the person when we read Historical Records of Successful Imperial Examinations Candidates. Xingyang Gong＇ s last name may be ＂Zheng＇, but we can＇ t be sure. We can find ＂Xingyang Gong＂ three times in Tang Narrative, and we can know that three is not only one ＂Xingyang Gong＂ .

关 键 词：《李娃传》 荥阳生 直言极谏科 荥阳公 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]