20世纪以来契丹族源研究述评  

Review on the research of the Khitan's origin since the 20th century

作　　者：郭晓东[1] GUO Xiaodong(College of Arts, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学文学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《辽宁工程技术大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期113-120,共8页Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：20世纪80年代以前,就契丹族源问题,我国学者倾向于用东胡之鲜卑或受他族影响的鲜卑解释,西方学界更习惯用蒙古系种族进行解读。二者存在异曲同工之处。20世纪80年代以后,我国学界就此问题的主流意见为东胡-鲜卑说和混合说。这呼应了之前中外学界的主流看法,更从史实基础、始祖传说、考古学等层面上拓宽了研究视野,加深了研究深度。但研究也存在一些争议性问题,尚有待进一步研究。Before the 1980s, about the Khitan＇s origin, Chinese scholars think they are the offspring of Donghu-Xianbei or Xian-Bei integrated with other races, while western scholars think they are of Mongolia race. There are two different approaches but equally satisfactory results. After the 1980s, mainstream views in the academic world are Donghu-Xianbei and mixed theory on this issue, which echo the previous mainstream views of Chinese and foreign scholars, and broaden the research horizon, deepen the research depth from historical facts, ancestor legends and archaeology. However, there are still some controversial questions that need further study.

关 键 词：20世纪 契丹 族源 述评 

分 类 号：K241[历史地理—历史学]