尿常规检验中常规化学法与尿分析仪的应用研究  

Clinical Application Effect of Conventional Chemical Method and Urine Analyzer in Urine Routine Test

作　　者：黄海深[1] 潘继钊 谭旭明[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省东莞市黄江医院,广东东莞523750

出　　处：《中国医学创新》2017年第9期116-118,共3页Medical Innovation of China

摘　　要：目的:分析比较尿常规检验采用常规化学法与尿分析仪的临床检验效果。方法:选取2016年1-12月本院进行尿常规检验的60例患者,每例患者各取两份尿液,分别采用常规化学法和尿分析仪进行尿常规的检验,比较两种检查方法的尿蛋白、红细胞、白细胞检测结果。结果:两种检查方法的尿蛋白、红细胞、白细胞阴性率、阳性率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种检测方法的尿蛋白检测符合率为98.33%,红细胞检测符合率为96.97%,白细胞检测符合率为95.00%。结论:应用常规化学法与尿分析仪进行尿常规检测的检验结果基本一致,为进一步提高检验准确性,可联用两种检验方式进行尿常规检验。Objective： To analyze and compare clinical application effect of conventional chemical method and urine analyzer in urine routine test.Method： From January 2016 to December 2016, 60 patients in our hospital for routine urine test, each patient was collected two copies of urine, the routine urine test was performed by conventional chemical method and urine analyzer.The results were compared with those of two methods, including urine protein, red blood cell and white blood cell.Result： The results of the two methods included urine protein, red blood cell, white blood cell negative rate, positive rate, the differences were not statistically significant （ P〉0.05 ） .Urinary protein detection coincidence rate was 98.33%, red blood cell detection coincidence rate was 96.97%, white blood cell detection coincidence rate was 95.00% of the two test methods.Conclusion： The results of routine urine test by conventional chemical method and urine analyzer are basically the same, in order to improve the accuracy of the test, two kinds of test methods can be used for routine urine test.

关 键 词：尿常规检验 常规化学法 尿分析仪 应用效果 

分 类 号：R446.12[医药卫生—诊断学]