检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]即墨市人民医院内科,山东青岛266200 [2]青岛市401医院肿瘤科,山东青岛266071
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第5期249-251,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的观察急性呼吸衰竭的急诊流程优化路径应用效果。方法选取我院2015年12月—2016年12月收治的104例急性呼吸衰竭患者作为研究对象,依据不同护理路径分为两组,对照组(48例)实施常规急救护理,研究组(56例)实施急诊流程优化路径,对比两组疗效性指标及并发症情况。结果研究组气管插管、血气检测等指标均优于对照组,且并发症总发生率较之对照组更低(P<0.05)。结论急诊流程优化路径实施于急性呼吸衰竭患者,可有效缩短其抢救时间,并减少并发症的发生,促使患者预后尽早恢复。Objective To observe the effect of emergency route in acute respiratory failure. Methods 104 patients with acute respiratory failure admitted in our hospital from December 2015 to December 2016 were selected as the subjects. According to the different nursing path, the control group (48 cases) was treated with routine emergency care. The study group (56 cases) to implement the emergency process optimization path, compared the two groups of efficacy indicators and complications. Results The tracheal intubation and blood gas were higher in the study group than in the control group, and the overall incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The optimal path of emergency treatment is effective in patients with acute respiratory failure, which can shorten the rescue time and reduce the occurrence of complications. The prognosis of patients with acute respiratory failure is expected to be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15