中国民法典制定背景下知识产权立法的选择  

The Choice of Intellectual Property Legislation in the Background of the Chinese Civil Code

作　　者：易继明[1] YI Ji-ming(Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871)

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第2期5-19,共15页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：2017年3月《中华人民共和国民法总则》通过,与物权、债权、继承等一样,其对知识产权也进行了概括性规定。对于民法典编纂而言,知识产权与民法典之间采取分离式、纳入式、链接式或者糅合式等4种连接方式的选择,归根到底就是知识产权法整体纳入民法典"入典"独立成编或者是制定专门知识产权法典单独"成典"这两种立法模式的选择。囿于历史和时代局限,近代自然法运动的法典成就在现代社会出现了危机。因应这一危机,需要回归自然理性的法典传统,循着私人生活的形式理性主义建立起统一的私法典。"入典"与"成典"之间,没有第三条道路。知识产权法整体纳入式的"入典"模式,既是知识产权制度自身的体系化,也是现代民法典不断自我完善的过程。In March 2017, ＂General Principles of the Civil Law of the People＇s Republic of China＂ pas- sed into law which provided general rules for intellectual property rights, just like property right, creditor＇ s rights, inheritance and so on. For the codification of civil law, the choice of four connection modes between in- tellectual property and civil code including separation type, take-in type, linking type and blending type, in the final analysis, is the choice of two legislative models ： one makes intellectual property law as a whole incorporat- ed into the Civil Code as a single part, while another develops specialized intellectual property code. Confined to the limitations of history and the times, the achievements of the modern natural law movement encounters cri- sis in the modern society. In response to this crisis, we need to return to the natural rationality of the tradition of codification, in order to establish a unified private code following the formal rationalism of private life. There is no third way between ＂into the code＂ mode and the ＂codification＂ mode. However, bringing intellectual proper- ty law as a whole into the civil code, the ＂into the code＂ model can realize both the systematization of intellec- tual property itself, but also the continuous improvement of a modern civil code.

关 键 词：民法典 知识产权法典 “入典”模式 “成典”模式 立法选择 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]