检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉理工大学管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《当代财经》2017年第4期57-66,共10页Contemporary Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点资助项目"复杂不确定性多主体多目标合作博弈与协商谈判的合作机制与合作模式"(71231007);国家自然科学基金青年项目"复杂工程中不完全信息多议题争端谈判的博弈模型与合作机制研究"(71501149)
摘 要:在互联网众筹市场中,由于项目发起人和消费者之间存在事前信息不对称,导致消费者在选择投资项目的过程中面临较大的风险;而作为中介的众筹平台,对发起人监督机制下的惩罚效用可以有效地规避此类问题。运用演化博弈理论分析了互联网众筹中,具有有限理性的众筹平台和项目发起人策略选择的互动机制,得出如下结论:在不考虑平台和发起人受外界声誉激励时,众筹平台的监管惩罚力度越大,发起人策略演化趋于如实揭示策略的可能性越大;项目发起人欺骗的程度越大,众筹平台策略演化趋于监管策略的可能性越大。反之,消费者资金安全问题将由平台承担其损失。有效实施监管,运用不同程度的惩罚策略,可以有效规制众筹平台项目发起人隐藏产品信息欺骗消费者的行为,引导发起人如实揭示项目类型,减少信息不对称带来的逆向选择,提高消费者参与众筹的积极性。In the online financing crowd-funding market, the consumers are faced with greaterrisks when selecting investment projects due to the asymmetry information between the project spon- sors and the consumers. While the crowd-funding platform as the intermediary can avoid such prob- lems effectively with its punishment effects under the sponsor supervision mechanism. This paper em- ploys the evolutionary game theory to analyze the interactive mechanism between the crowd-funding platform with bounded rationality and the project sponsors' strategic selection in the intemet crowd-funding. The findings are as follows: when the platform and the sponsors' incentive from out- side reputation are not taken into consideration, the heavier the supervision punishment by the crowd-funding, the greater the possibility that the sponsors' strategic evolution will tend to be re- vealing the truth; otherwise, the greater the sponsors' deceitful degree, the greater the possibility that the crowd-funding strategic evolution will tend to be the supervision strategy; while the safety of the consumers' funds will be the responsibility of the platform. Therefore, effective implementation of the supervision and application of the punishment strategy of different degrees can regulate effectively the behaviors of concealing the product information to deceive consumers by the project sponsors, lead the sponsors to reveal the true projects, reduce the adverse selection resulted from asymmetric in- formation, and raise the consumers' enthusiasm to participate the crowd-funding.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.184.99