检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西大学商学院,广西南宁530004 [2]广西大学中国-东盟研究院,广西南宁530004
出 处:《华东经济管理》2017年第4期82-88,共7页East China Economic Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41161024;41561026)
摘 要:贸易自由化的工资效应具有空间尺度性,在我国边境地区的国际开放水平滞后且产业集聚程度不如沿海地区的客观现实下,文章构建的两国三区域模型揭示,国际开放和区际开放与边境实际工资均呈现U型关系。进一步,以云南和广西各市为例的实证研究发现,面向东盟国家的国际开放与区际开放度较高,故而对边境地区的工资水平具有促进作用,而与其他国家及地区的国际开放度较低,产生抑制工资增长的作用。最后,边境地区工资在短期内虽然受到与其他国家开放带来的负面冲击,但是由于劳动力流动的非瞬时性,边境地区应尽快提升双向开放度,特别是对其他国家及地区的开放程度,来扭转负面局势。The wage effect of trade liberalization has a spatial scale. With the objective fact that the level of international openness on the border regions lags behind to the coastal areas, as well as the industrial concentration degree. This paper buihts a three-region model. which reveals that there is an U-shaped relationship between the openness and real wages for the border regions both internationally trod interregionally. Moreover, the study, using the cities both in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces as empirical examples, shows that the higher international and interregional openness to ASEAN countries has an promoting effect on the wage growth, however the lower openness to other countries has a negative effect on the wage growth. Finally, in the short term, although the border wages are confronted with the nega- tive impact brought by the openness to inter-regions and other countries, the border regions ought to improve bi-direetional openness, es- pecially to other countries as soon as possible, to reverse the negative situation because of the non-instantaneity of labor mobility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42