职务犯监禁刑行刑中的权力寻租防范  

Study on Power Rent-Seeking in the Execution of Imprisonment of Duty Criminals

作　　者：杨锦芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《学术探索》2017年第4期68-72,共5页Academic Exploration

基　　金：云南省教育厅项目(2015Y095);云南省丽江监狱项目(KKDS201524004)

摘　　要：为应对职务犯监禁刑执行过程中行刑权异化之权力寻租问题,我国监狱机关对职务犯采取了独立关押措施,但从权力寻租产生原因分析,关押模式的改变并不能直接杜绝和控制监狱行刑权权力寻租现象的发生。行刑中的权力寻租主要体现在执行变更的过程中,为此最高人民法院、最高人民检察院分别出台了司法解释,司法部也制订了相关规定。司法解释和司法部相关规定的出台符合阻止权力寻租产生的条件,为我国防范在行刑中的权力寻租提供了很好的思路,相关内容可在经过实践进一步检验后通过法律予以细化和丰富。然而这并非一劳永逸,防范行刑中的权力寻租应进一步实现行刑制度和行刑监督的法治化,同时行刑中充分体现平等价值。In order to solve the problem of power rent - seeking in the execution of imprisonment of prisoners of duty crime, the prison authorities of our country have adopted independent detention measures for duty offenders. However, the change of deten- tion mode can not directly eliminate and control the phenomenon of power - seeking rent seeking in prison. Thus, the Supreme People＇ s Court as well as the Supreme People＇ s Procuratorate has issued judicial interpretation, and the Ministry of justice has formulated the relevant provisions. From the perspective of the causes of power rent - seeking theory, the introduction of policy and judicial interpretation in line with the conditions for preventing the power of rent - seeking provide a good idea to prevent the power of change in the execution, and the relevant content can be further tested by practice to be refined and enriched by law. However, to tackle the power rent -seeking issue once and for all, we should try to realize the legalization of execution system and execution supervision, and fully embody the value of equality in execution.

关 键 词：权力寻租 职务犯 监禁刑 独立关押 法治 

分 类 号：DF84[政治法律—法学]