以史为鉴:马锡五审判方式的优越性与局限性——以1945年陕甘宁边区推事审判员联席会议的档案资料为依据  

Merits and Qualifications of Ma Xiwu's Trial Mode in Practice——Taking History as A Mirror on the Basis of the Archive Recordings of the Judges' Joint Conference in Shaan-Gan-Ning Border Area in 1945

作　　者：李娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学中华法系与法治文明研究院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《山东科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期45-51,60,共8页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"法治文化的传统资源及其创造性转化研究"(14ZDC023);高等学校青年骨干教师国内访问学者项目经费资助

摘　　要：随着马锡五审判方式在陕甘宁边区的普遍推广,边区司法实践中开始出现新的问题和挑战,因此1945年的推事审判员联席会议的重要议题之一就是马锡五审判方式。研究和分析边区推事审判员的亲身实践、经验教训及讨论结果,可以帮助我们更深地认识马锡五审判方式的优越性与局限性。鉴于此,如果我们能将马锡五审判方式限制在合理的范围之内,避免将其教条化、政治化,马锡五审判方式在保障司法公正、提升司法权威方面仍能发挥重要作用。Along with the popularization of Maxiwu＇s Trial Mode in Shaan-Gan-Ning Border Area, there were new problems and challenges. So Maxiwu＇s Trial Mode became one of the important subjects in the judges＇ joint conference in 1945. The Research and analysis of these judges＇ practice, exhortation and conclusion can help us more deeply and more reasonably to understand the merits and the qualifications of Maxiwu＇ s Trial Mode. Therefore if we now can restrict Maxiwu＇ s Trial Mode to a reasonable ex- tent and avoid the mistakes of dogmatization and politicization, Maxiwu＇ s Trial Mode can still play an important role in guaranteeing the judicial justice and improving the judicial authority.

关 键 词：马锡五审判方式 1945年 陕甘宁边区推事审判员联席会议 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]