检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第2期98-105,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(15BSH107)
摘 要:文章在文献梳理基础上,把作为公共资产的集群品牌风险分为"搭便车"风险、"公共地"风险和机会主义风险。在此基础上,对集群品牌三类风险的博弈论研究进行了批判性述评。述评以相关研究为主线,详细分析了集群品牌"公共地"风险和机会主义风险论证中存在的前提假设不当、推理论证错误,或假设过于简化,未能充分揭示集群品牌风险及其形成机制。述评发现,目前还未有真正对"搭便车"风险的博弈论研究。文章认为集群品牌风险的博弈论研究虽然取得突破,但是相关研究还需要修正、完善和深化,或需要做更具开拓性的工作。Based on the literature review, this paper classified cluster brand risks into ree “ commons” risk and opportunism risk. On this basis, a critic review was conducted on the game theory studies about the three risks of cluster brand. The review took relevant studies as main line,and analyzed improper precondition hypothesis and inference demonstration mistakes existing in “commons” risk and opportunism risk of cluster brand, or too simplified assumptions of a cluster so that cluster brand risks and the formation mechanism failed to be revealed fully. It is found that there is no game theory study on “ free ride” risk of cluster brand. Although the game theory studies on cluster brand risks have achieved a breakthrough, relevant researches still need to be improved or deepened, and even some ground-breaking work is required.
分 类 号:F062.5[经济管理—政治经济学] F061.5
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28