引流袋代替负压瓶在内镜甲状腺手术患者中的应用  

Application of drainage pack instead of negative pressure bottle in endoscopic thyroidectomy patients

作　　者：朱文英[1] ZHU Wen-ying(Yuedong Hospital Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Meizhou 514700, China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学附属第三医院粤东医院,514700

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2017年第6期43-45,共3页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较引流袋与负压瓶在内镜甲状腺手术患者中的应用效果。方法 87例甲状腺手术治疗患者,41例手术后采用负压瓶装置进行术后引流患者作为对照组,46例术后采用引流袋装置进行引流患者作为观察组。比较两组患者进行不同引流后的引流量、引流时间以及手术刀口拔管后伤口积液量。结果观察组患者引流量为(45.12±2.18)ml、引流时间为(19.04±3.47)h、积液量为(0.94±0.18)ml,对照组患者引流量为(38.26±1.97)ml、引流时间为(22.54±3.18)h、积液量为(1.89±1.47)ml,两组患者引流量、引流时间及积液量比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论引流袋代替负压瓶能够在内镜甲状腺手术中应用效果明显,值得临床医学上推广。Objective To compare application effects by drainage pack and negative pressure bottle in endoscopic thyroidectomy patients. Methods Among 87 patients treated by endoscopic thyroidectomy, there were 41 patients as control group receiving negative pressure bottle for postoperative drainage and 46 patients as observation group receiving drainage pack for postoperative drainage. Comparison was made on drainage volume, drainage duration, and incision effusion quantity after extubation between the two groups after different measures for drainage. Results The observation group had drainage volume as（45.12±2.18） ml, drainage duration as（19.04±3.47） h, and effusion quantity as（0.94±0.18） ml. The control group had drainage volume as（38.26±1.97） ml, drainage duration as（22.54±3.18） h, and effusion quantity as（1.89±1.47） ml. The difference of drainage volume, drainage duration, and effusion quantity had statistical significance between the two groups（P0.05）. Conclusion Drainage pack can provide remarkable effect, instead of negative pressure bottle, in endoscopic thyroidectomy, and this method is worthy of promotion in clinical medicine.

关 键 词：引流袋 负压瓶引流 内镜甲状腺手术 

分 类 号：R653[医药卫生—外科学]