检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周浩斌[1] 安冬琪 詹琼[1] 刘祖恒[1] 华经海[1] 赖文岩[1] 黄裕立[1] 曾庆春 许顶立[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院心血管内科省部共建“器官衰竭防治”国家重点实验室,广州510515
出 处:《中华内科杂志》2017年第4期253-257,共5页Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
摘 要:目的比较不同左心室射血分数(LVEF)心力衰竭(心衰)患者的临床特征和预后。方法纳入因心衰住院的患者1182例,根据其LVEF分为射血分数减低型心衰(HFrEF,LVEF〈40%,313例)、射血分数中间范围型心衰(HFmrEF,LVEF40%~〈50%,287例)、射血分数保留型心衰(HFpEF,LVEF〉150%,582例)3组,对3组进行回顾观察性研究,并进行中位时间为23.7个月的随访,随访率83.6%(941例),HFrEF组、HFmrEF组、HFpEF组的随访率分别为81.3%、84.9%、84.0%。结果(1)在本研究中,HFrEF患者313例(26.5%),HFmrEF患者287例(24.3%),HFpEF患者582例(49.2%)。(2)与HFrEF组相比,HFmrEF组缺血性心脏病更多见。HFmrEF组的年龄、女性比例、收缩压、血尿酸、N末端B型利钠肽前体、血红蛋白及高血压心脏病、贫血、心房颤动患病率等高于HFrEF组,但低于HFpEF组(P值均〈0.01)。(3)本组心衰患者第1、2、5年的全因死亡率分别为10.8%、20.6%、35.9%,3组间第1、2、5年全因死亡率差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05)。结论HFmrEF代表着一个新的、不同的心衰分类,其很多特征介于HFrEF和HFpEF之间。不同LVEF心衰患者全因死亡率差异无统计学意义。Objective To compare the clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with heart failure with different left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF). Methods A total of 1 182 hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) were enrolled and retrospectively studied in the present study. The patients were stratified by LVEF as reduced ( HFrEF, LVEF 〈 40% , n = 313 ) , mid-range ( HFmrEF, 40% ≤ LVEF 〈50%, n =287) and preserved (HFpEF, LVEF≥50%, n =582) ejection fraction groups. Among the 1 182 cases, 941 of them (81.3%, 84. 9%, and 84.0% inHFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups, respectively) were followed up for an median duration of 27.3 months. Results ( 1 ) Among the study patients, 26. 5% were in HFrEF, 24. 3% in HFmrEF, and 49. 2% in HFpEF groups. (2) Ischemic heart disease with HFmrEF was more frequent than that in patients with HFrEF. The average age, percentage of female subjects, systolic blood pressure, uric acid, N terminal B-type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT- proBNP), hemoglobin, and the incidence of hypertensive heart disease, anemia, atrial fibrillation in patients with HFmrEF were higher than those in patients with HFrEF, but lower than those in patients with HFpEF (all P〈O. 01). (3) The all-cause cumulative mortality was 10. 8% at 1 year, 20. 6% at 2 years and 35.9% at 5 years. No difference was observed in the all-cause cumulative mortality at 1 year, 2 years, 5 years among the three groups ( all P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusions The HFmrEF patients, as a new and distinct group, were with many intermediate characteristics compared with HFrEF and HFpEF subjects. However, the all-cause mnrtalitv was not significantly different among HF patients with different LVEF.
分 类 号:R541.6[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249