检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《基层医学论坛》2017年第7期845-846,共2页The Medical Forum
基 金:江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目(20155078)
摘 要:目的比较γ-干扰素释放分析法(IGRA-ELISA)、胶体金法(TB-DOT)以及PCR检测(TB-PCR)在结核感染患者中的诊断效能。方法选择住院高危结核感染病例141例,分别采用IGRA-ELISA、TB-DOT和TB-PCR进行检测,评价三种检测方法的诊断效能。结果 IGRA-ELISA灵敏度89.89%,特异度94.23%;TB-DOT灵敏度86.52%,特异度92.31%;TB-PCR灵敏度73.03%,特异度98.08%。结论IGRA-ELISA技术对结核病诊断方面具有较高的灵敏度和特异度,应用价值显著。Objective To compare the analysis method of IGRA-ELISA release of interferon gamma, colloidal gold (TB-DOT) and PCR (TB-PCR) detection in diagnosis of tuberculosis in the performance of patients. Methods The IGRA-ELISA,TB-DOT and TB-PCR were used in 141 hospitalized patients with high risk of infection combined with to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the three methods. Results The sensitivity of IGRA was 89.89%, and the specificity was 94.23% ;the sensitivity of TB-DOT was 86.52% ,and the specificity was 92.31% ;the sensitivity of TB-PCR was 73.03%, and the specificity was 98.08%.Conclusion IGRA-ELISA technology has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of tuberculosis, obvious application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222