检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑增辉[1]
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学,江西南昌330032
出 处:《科技创业月刊》2017年第7期1-4,共4页Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology
摘 要:运用效率评价方法中的BCC模型对中部六省的财政支出效率进行比较评价,结合2010-2015年的数据,研究结果发现,中部六省之中,山西省的财政支出效率在此时间段间始终处于DEA有效状态,但是江西省却从2013年开始由DEA有效转变为弱DEA有效,规模效率缺失,其余的省份,在技术效率上都是接近DEA有效状态,但是由于规模效率的低下,造成综合效率失效,说明也都存在着不同程度投入上的冗余状况,对各省财政支出及时调整有一定的参考意义。By using the BCC model in the efficiency evaluation method, this paper makes a comparative e- valuation of the fiscal expenditure efficiency of the six provinces in the central region. Based on the data from 2010 to 2015, it is found that the fiscal expenditure efficiency of Shanxi province in the middle six provinces is between this period always in the DEA active state.But Jiangxi province from the beginning of 2013 by DEA ef- fective conversion to weak DEA effective, lack of scale efficiency.The rest of the provinces, in terms of technical efficiency are close to the DEA effective state.However, due to the low efficiency of scale, resulting in the fail- ure of comprehensive efficiency, indicating that there are different levels of investment on the redundant situa- tion, the provincial financial expenditure in a timely manner to adjust a certain reference value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117