城市土地使用权到期续租与否?——基于财政可持续性的分析  

The Renewal of Urban Land-use Rights upon Expiry: Should Renewal be Free?——An Analysis Based on Fiscal Sustainability

作　　者：黄文浩[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2017年第2期27-47,共21页Journal of Public Administration

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(16XNH023)

摘　　要：温州20年产权房续租事件反映了我国土地政策还不完善的境况,过渡性办法虽暂时化解风险,却也使具有普遍性的70年城市土地使用权到期后是否需要续租的问题彰显了出来,并进入公共政策议程。目前,地方可支配的财政收入高度依赖由土地出让金构成的土地财政。基于此,论文运用单案例研究法,以保障财政的可持续为前提,具体分析非常态期限和常态期限两种情形的法律与现实,并对续租与否进行财政可持续性评价。研究发现,续租政策与财政可持续性有着互为影响的关系。续租政策对财政可持续性的影响作用短期内更为显著,财政可持续性对续租政策的影响尽管不大,但在长期起到了关键的作用。论文强调土地财政的结构性调整应是一个渐进过程,这有利于地方政府形成健康的公共财政体制。In Wenzhou,property rights to housing have been renewed for another 20 years. Or,in other words,China' s land policy is not perfect. This transitional policy has temporarily resolved the homeowners ' risks,but it has merely pushed a general problem-should urban land-use rights be free after they expire in 70 years-onto the public policy agenda. At present, local governmentsare highly dependent on land finance which consists of land-transfer fees. This paper uses the single case study method to analyze the law and the reality of abnormal and normal land tenure on the premise of ensuring fiscal sustainability; it also evaluates the fiscal sustainabilityof making renewal unnecessary. Based on the study ' s findings, there was a mutual influence between the renewal policy and fiscal sustainability. The renewal policy had a significant effect on fiscal sustainability in the short term. And fiscal sustainability had a modest effect on the renewal policy,but it played a key role in the long term. The structural adjustment of land finance should be a gradual process; this go slow approach will help local government to form a healthy public fiscal system.

关 键 词：土地使用权 续租 财政可持续性 土地财政 财政风险 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]