资本下乡:为农增利还是与农争利?——基于浙江嵊州S村调查  

Does Investing Industrial Capital in a Rural Area Have a Positive or Negative Effect on Peasants' Interests?——A Survey of S Village in Shengzhou,Zhejiang Province

作　　者：杨雪锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江财经大学公共管理学院

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2017年第2期67-84,共18页Journal of Public Administration

基　　金：浙江省高校重大人文社科项目攻关计划项目(2013QN002)

摘　　要：资本下乡进入农业生产领域产生的经济效率毋庸置疑,但是通过介入土地流转而对土地要素所有权进行实质性控制将会对农民福祉和农村发展产生何种影响却难下定论。论文选取浙江LC集团现代农业开发公司参与嵊州S村土地流转为例,分析工商资本在土地流转中对农民收益和农村经济社会的影响,以及政、商、村、农在土地流转中利益关系的变化,剖析S村土地流转机制,构建四者关系分析框架。研究发现,土地兼并对农村集体经济具有诸多正效应,对农户总体有改善但个体则产生分化,特别是流转过程中多数农户正当利益受到挤占,政、商、村、农之间存在利益纠葛却没有相应的疏解机制。通过个案分析,能够对城市工商资本介入农村土地流转的机理及其效应进行较具体细致的刻画。论文最后提出构建土地流转收益分配的合理秩序和工商资本参与土地流转的监管政策等方面的建议。Investing industrial capital in a rural area can create economic efficiency,but it also limits the land use circulation; whether this will have a positive or negative effect on peasant welfare and local social development is uncertain. For this study,the effect of LC Group development ofan eco-agricutural project on land rights in S village in Shengzhou was analyzed usingboth the institutional economics and public governance approaches through a case study. This paper explains the mechanism and effect of the circulation of land-use rights in S village during the study period. It also describes the changesinthe relationships between four groups: local government,industrial capital,village collective and peasants, and builds an analysis framework based on those relationships. It was found that the concentration of landholding had a positive effect on the village collective ' s and, on the whole, farmers ' welfare improved with the differentiation between individuals; however,most farmers ' legitimate interests were violated and formal mechanismsfor resolving disputes between the four groups was lacking. Finally, the paper presents suggestions about land return distribution and regulation policies.

关 键 词：资本下乡 农民权益 土地流转 政策监管 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济] F323.9