《历代名画记》补遗——浅谈谢赫对顾恺之的矛盾评价问题  

Supplement to Views on Great Paintings of Past Ages—Xie He's Contradictory Evaluations of Gu Kaizhi

作　　者：张真[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学艺术学院,南京210000

出　　处：《文化艺术研究》2017年第1期129-135,共7页Studies in Culture and Art

基　　金：国家社科艺术类单项"基于序跋及题跋整理上的中国古代书画著录版本学及校勘学研究"(项目编号:14BA012)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：张彦远在《历代名画记》中对顾恺之的评价出现了矛盾的叙述。他一方面对顾恺之高度赞许,另一方面又肯定谢赫的品评,而谢赫对顾恺之的评价却并不高。前人对于这一问题已有研究,将重点放在张彦远品评的悖论上。然而,《历代名画记》中还出现了谢赫对顾恺之品评的悖论——"迹不怠意,声过其实"和"谢赫论江左画人,吴曹不兴、晋顾长康、宋陆探微皆为上品,余皆中下品"的矛盾描述。本文基于这一未被前人关注的矛盾进行探讨,希冀有新的发现。There are ambivalent descriptions of Gu Kaizhi in Zhang Yanyuan , s book Views on Great Paintings of Past Ages. Zhang spoke highly of Gu on the one hand, but affirmed Xie He, s evalua-tion on Gu which was not high on the other hand. Previous researchers have studied this issue andfocused on the paradoxical evaluation of Zhang. However, Zhang＇s book also recorded paradoxical evaluations of Xie. This article focuses on the paradox which is not noticed by predecessors in the hope of a new discovery.

关 键 词：《历代名画记》 《建康实录》 顾恺之 谢赫 

分 类 号：J203[艺术—美术]