论WTO司法权的边界  

The Boundary of WTO Jurisdiction

作　　者：陈立虎[1] 吴欢欢[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《时代法学》2017年第2期104-113,共10页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：世界贸易组织通过引入争端解决机制,有效地解决了其成员间的贸易争端,确保了世界贸易组织各项协议的遵守而被公认为是世界贸易组织最独特的贡献。然而在其运作过程中,作为国际语境下的司法性机构,实践的挑战使得争端解决机构遭遇了来自世界贸易组织框架内外的多重合法化危机,并愈演愈烈。贸易与环境的均衡、法律适用的权限等现实问题使得争端解决机构不得不对其合法化边界进行重新划定。而在国际机构良善运行之必要、贸易本身的穿越性以及不同国际法规范追求的价值必然迥异的大背景下,争端解决机构司法边界的重新划定应从遵从国际法原理、公平解决贸易交叉引发的法律问题以及科学处理条约法律冲突等多方面进行。The World Trade Organization solves members, trade disputes effectively and ensures agreements thereof to be complied by introducing the dispute settlement mechanism, which is ac-knowledged as the most unique contribution of the World Trade Organization. However,as a judicial institution in the international context, challenges from practice make the dispute settlement body suffer from the multiple legalization crises both within and outside the framework of the World Trade Organization in its process of operation, and crises thereabove turn more and more serious. Real problems such as the balance between trade and environment, and competence in applying law prompt dispute settlement body to redraw the judicial boundary. With the necessity in acting in good faith of international institutions N the virtue in crossing different area of trade and the distinguished values pursued by different international doctrines, the judicial boundary of dispute settlement body should be redraw from three respects, namely, conforming to international law principles, settling legal issues resulted from trade crossing fairly and dealing with conflict among treaties scientifically.

关 键 词：正当性 合法化边界 贸易偏见 法庭之友 

分 类 号：DF90[政治法律—国际法学]