两种输血不良反应回报方法的比较  

Comparison between 2 Report Methods of Adverse Reactions in Transfusion

作　　者：曹昌柏[1] 宋建伟[1] 邹静[1] 徐灵[1] 王亚[1] 刘小芹[1] 陈卓仁[1] 

机构地区：[1]长江大学第一临床医学院荆州市第一人民医院输血科,湖北荆州434000

出　　处：《长江大学学报（自然科学版）》2017年第4期54-55,80,共3页Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：湖北省卫生计生科研基金资助项目(W22015CB014)

摘　　要：目的:建立输血不良反应监测系统,对输血不良反应进行研究、分析,探究有效的预防和降低临床发生输血不良反应的手段和措施。方法:将输血不良反应纸质上报与输血不良反应网上直报的回报率、24h回报及时性、临床满意度进行对比分析。结果:8517例输血病例,共计14406U成分输血。输血不良反应回报单纸质上报方法的回报率为59.5%、24h回报率为20.5%、临床科室使用满意度为1.7%;网上直报方法回报率为100.0%、24h回报率为84.9%、临床科室使用满意度为98.3%。结论:输血不良反应网上直报在回报率、24h回报及时性、临床满意度上均高于传统的输血不良反应纸质上报。Objective:To establish a transfusion adverse reaction monitoring system,and to explore effective measures to prevent and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions by studying and analyzing the adverse reactions of transfusion.Methods:The rates of return from the paper reports of the adverse reactions of the transfusion and the rates from the internet reports had been compared and analyzed as well as 24-hour return timeliness and the clinical satisfaction degrees.Results:In 8517cases of transfusion,a total of 14406Ucomponents of transfusion,the rate of return from the paper reports was 59.5%,24-hour return timeliness 20.5%and the clinical satisfaction degree 1.7%,and respectively100.0%,84.9%and 98.3%for the internet reports.Conclusion:The return from the internet reports of adverse reaction of transfusion is much better than that from the paper reports from perspectives of the rate of return,24-hour timeliness and the clinical satisfaction degree.

关 键 词：输血不良反应 输血不良反应纸质上报 输血不良反应网上直报 

分 类 号：R457.13[医药卫生—治疗学]