宁夏生态移民居住安置方式的减贫效果分析  

Poverty reduction effects of ecological migrants resettlement ways for Ningxia

作　　者：邰秀军[1] 畅冬妮 郭颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学经济与管理学院,临汾041004

出　　处：《干旱区资源与环境》2017年第4期47-53,共7页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(编号:15BMZ094)资助

摘　　要：依据宁夏回族自治区10个移民新村的调查数据,采用FGT贫困测度指标、偏相关分析方法分析了生态移民户的贫困水平、趋势和相关性,探讨了集中连片和集中但不连片两种安置方式减贫效果差异的原因。研究发现:移民户集中但不连片居住的安置方式,既有利于使移民户保持原有的社会联系,同时有助于移民户利用附近的农业产业园区,形成就近务工,增加市场行为;还有利于增加与已有居民的社会联系,促使移民户在转换生计方式、思想观念等方面发生变化,这些因素都有利于移民户实现减贫脱贫。Using the survey data in 10 immigrant village,Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region,we analyzed the ecological migrants＇ poverty level,tendency and its correlation by the methods of FGT poverty measures and partial correlation analysis. In addition,we also discussed the reasons of different poverty reduction effects by comparing two different resettlement modes： ＂ concentrated contiguous living resettlement＂ and ＂ concentrated but not contiguous living resettlement＂. Results show that settlers who resettled in concentrated but not contiguous new resettlement sites had a better function on poverty reduction than another. The reason was up to accessible development opportunity and households self-learning capability. For example,settlers who resettled in a concentrated but not contiguous new resettlement site could use the opportunities of industrialization effectively,found a job in neighborhood,and increased market behavior. In addition,due to the increase of opportunity of social contact with the home residents,these people could change the ideas of production,and help them to transfer their livelihood from farm to nonfarm.

关 键 词：生态移民 减贫 安置方式 宁夏 

分 类 号：C922[社会学—人口学]