检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵明非[1]
出 处:《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第2期82-88,共7页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:由于我国现有立法缺乏区分雇佣关系与承揽关系的可操作性的标准,对二者进行划分一直是我国司法实践中的难点。对于无法准确定性的劳务关系,法院往往倾向于认定其为雇佣关系,这种错误倾向在实践中带来了很多不利后果。区分雇佣关系与承揽关系的关键在于确定相对具体化的区别标准,即采用列举的方式为区分二者的标准进行示例。在此基础上还应当综合评价区分雇佣关系和承揽关系的各项标准,并按照各项标准在决定劳务关系性质问题上所起的作用为其划分序列或位阶,以便实务工作者参照适用。Curently, due to the lack of operational standards between the contractor's agreement and employment relation- ship, the division has always been the difficulty in the judicial practice in China. Courts tend to affirm the labor relations which cannot accurate qualitative as employment relationship. This kind of erroneous tendencies trigger many adverse consequences. The key to distinguish contractor's agreement from employment relationship is to determine the specific standards, which is to adopt the way of enumeration to distinguish between the two standards as examples. Besides, the comprehensive evaluation of the standards of classification is necessary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15