民法语境下消费者撤回权的正当性:意思表示的瑕疵与救济  

The Legitimacy of Consumers' Withdrawal Right Under the Context of Civil Law:Defects and Remedies of Intention Expression

作　　者：李浩然 何冰玉 黄书立[3] 

机构地区：[1]中化石油有限公司,北京100101 [2]北京市君合律师事务所,北京100005 [3]中共吉林省委党校,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《行政与法》2017年第4期110-121,共12页Administration and Law

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金重点项目"网上交易与消费者权益保护"的阶段性成果;项目编号:14FXA002

摘　　要：单纯认为消费者处于弱势地位而赋予其撤回权的认识过于笼统,且不足以解释为什么要赋予其效力如此强大的权利。法律完全可以通过确定责任较重的罚则来保护消费者,而无须挑战合同严守原则。因此,在民法语境下审视消费者撤回权的正当性实有必要。随着意思突袭与远程通讯手段的出现,消费者意思表示的形成已经受到了实质性影响,意思形成自由受到拘束。非充分意思表示才是撤回权可以冲破合同严守原则的根本原因。It is too generally simply to think that consumers are in a disadvantageous position and give them the withdrawal right and is not enough to explain why endow them with such a powerful right.The laws can absolutely protect the consumers by determining heavier penalties without having to challenge the principle of strict adherence to contracts. Therefore,it is of true necessity to sur^ey the legitimacy of consumers′ withdrawal right under the context of civil law. With the emergence of intention assault and remote communication,there has been substantial impacts in the formation of the consumers′ intention expression and the freedom of intention expression has been under constraint.The insufficient intention expression is actually the real reason why the withdrawal right can break through the principle of strict adherence to contracts.

关 键 词：消费者撤回权 非充分意思表示 意思突袭 远程交易通讯手段 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]