检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属漳州市医院,福建漳州363000
出 处:《医疗装备》2017年第8期165-166,共2页Medical Equipment
摘 要:目的研究社区护理干预对原发性高血压患者治疗的影响。方法选取2014年1月至2015年12月某社区的126例高血压患者,进行健康宣教、心理干预、用药干预、运动指导、家庭随访等干预措施后据血压水平控制情况评估护理干预效果。结果 126例高血压患者,血压控制有效率为95.24%。与社区护理干预前比较,社区护理干预后高血压患者收缩压、舒张压均下降[(124.37±16.38)mmHg VS(167.32±15.26)mmHg,(82.74±9.13)mmHg VS(99.52±8.19)mmHg](P<0.05)。结论社区护理干预对改善高血压患者血压控制效果、提高患者生命质量有积极影响。Objective To study the effect of community nursing intervention on the treatment of patients with primary hypertension. Methods 126 cases of patients with hypertension from January 2014 to December 2015 in a community, are health education, psychological intervention and drug intervention, sports guidance, family follow - up intervention measures according to the level of blood pressure control effect evaluation ofnursing intervention. Results Blood pressure control rate of 126 patients with hypertension, was 95. 24% , Compared with the community nursing intervention before and after community nursing intervention in hypertensive patients with systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure decreased [(124. 37 ± 16. 38) mmHg vs (167. 32 ± 15. 26) mmHg,(82. 74 ±9.13) mmHg vs (99. 52 ±8. 19) mmHg] ( P〈0. 05) . Conclusion Commu-nity nursing intervention has positive influence on improving the blood pressure control effect and the quality of life of patients with hypertension, and it has the significance and value of promotion.
分 类 号:R544.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.123