机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学康复医学院,上海201203 [2]上海体育学院运动康复学系,上海200438 [3]上海体育学院"运动健身科技"省部共建教育部重点实验室,上海200438 [4]上海中医药大学附属第七人民医院康复医学部,上海200137
出 处:《上海中医药杂志》2017年第4期73-76,共4页Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家体育总局健身气功管理中心科研项目(QG2016059);上海市教委市属博士学科点建设基金项目(B201507);上海市浦东新区卫计委卫生科技项目(PW2014A-20);上海市浦东新区卫计委卫生系统重点学科建设资助项目(PWZx2014-17);上海市浦东新区科技发展基金创新资金项目(PKJ2013-Y25);上海市自然科学基金(15IR1441000);上海市卫计委中医药科研项目(2016LP037)
摘 要:目的观察五禽戏锻炼对中老年女性膝关节肌力及平衡能力的影响。方法将56例中老年女性志愿者采用类实验的方法分为干预组与对照组,每组28例。干预组进行五禽戏锻炼,对照组进行拉伸锻炼。两组均干预12个月,观察比较膝关节等速肌力测试指标及Berg平衡量表评分(以下简称Berg评分)的变化情况。结果 (1)干预组组内各时点比较:右膝伸肌、左膝屈肌T1与T2的PW比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);左右膝关节屈、伸肌T2与T3的PW比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);左右膝关节屈、伸肌T1与T3的PW比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组组内各时点比较:左右膝关节屈、伸肌T1、T2、T3时点分别两两相比,PW差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)组间T3时比较,两组左右膝伸肌的PW差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组左右膝屈肌的PW差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)干预组组内各时点比较:T1、T2、T3两两比较时,Berg评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组组内各时点比较:T1与T2、T1与T3比较时,Berg评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);T2与T3比较,Berg评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。组间T3时比较,两组Berg评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论五禽戏锻炼可以提高中老年女性膝关节相关肌力,起到延缓肌力下降、提高平衡能力的作用。Objective To observe the influence of five mimic-animal exercise on knee-joint muscle strength and balance capacity in middle-aged and elderly women. Methods 56 middle-aged and elderly women volunteers were divided into the intervention group and control group by the methods of quasi-experiment, 28 cases in each group. Five mimic-animal exercise were performed in the intervention group and stretching exercises were performed in the control group, with a course of 12 months. The indexes of isokinetic test in knee-joint and the scores of' Berg balance scale were observed and compared. Results ① Comparison of different time points ( T1 refers to treatment before, T2 and T3 refer to treatment for 6 and 12 months respectively ) in the intervention group: For the comparison of peak torque/body weight(PW) in right knee extensors and left knee flexors, there were statistically significant differences between T1 and T2 ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; for the PW comparison in extensors and flexors of left and right knee, there were no statistically significant differences between T2 and T3 (P 〉 0. 05 ), there were statistically significant differences between TI and T3 ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Comparison of different time points in the control group: for the PW comparison in extensors and flexors of left and right knee, there were no statistically significant difterences between T1 and T2 ,T2 and T3 ,T1 and T3 ( P 〉 0.05 ). ②For the comparison in extensors of left and right knee at T3,there was statistically significant difference on PW between the two groups( P 〈 0.05 ) ;while for the comparison in flexors of left and right knee at 33, there was no statistically significant difference on PW between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). ③Comparison of different time points in the intervention group : there were statistically significant differences on Berg scores between T1 and T2, T2 and T3, T1 and 33 (P 〈 0.05 ). Comparison of different time points in the control group:there were statistical
分 类 号:R247.4[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...