检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2017年第8期163-165,共3页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的研究分析胫腓骨骨折患者接受综合护理的临床效果,为临床护理提供依据。方法选取我院2014年1月—2015年1月收治的132例胫腓骨骨折患者作为研究对象,将其分成实验组和对照组,每组均有66例。实验组采用综合护理,对照组采用常规护理,对两组患者的骨牵引时间和满意度进行分析研究。结果护理后,实验组患者骨牵引时间短于对照组,两组结果对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对患者进行了问卷调查,实验组的临床满意度为96.97%,对照组为40.91%,两组患者临床护理满意度对比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胫腓骨骨折患者采用综合护理后,实验组患者满意度显著提高,患者的恢复时间缩短。Objective To study the clinical effect of comprehensive nursing for patients with tibia and fibula fracture, and to provide basis for clinical nursing. Methods 132 cases of patients with tibia and fibula fractures treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2015 were selected as the research object. The patients were divided into experimental group and control group, 66 cases in each group. The experimental group was treated with comprehensive nursing, the control group received routine nursing care. The bone traction time and satisfaction of two groups were analyzed. Results After nursing, the experimental group was shorter than the control group, the results of the two groups were compared, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The patients were investigated by questionnaire. The satisfaction degree of the experimental group was 96.97%, while that of the control group was 40.91%, two groups of patients with clinical nursing satisfaction, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The patients with tibia and fibula fracture were treated with comprehensive nursing, the satisfaction degree of the patients in the experimental group was significantly improved, and the recovery time was shortened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.217