检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海200051 [2]上海财经大学国际工商管理学院,上海200433 [3]南伊利诺伊大学商学院,美国62901
出 处:《证券市场导报》2017年第4期20-28,共9页Securities Market Herald
基 金:国家留学基金委资助项目(201506630047);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(CUSF-DH-D-2015065)
摘 要:本文基于产业关联性视角,研究股权转让与创业投资家得到的投资回报之间的关系,通过测算716笔股权转让的相关数据,分析单方股权转让和协同股权转让之间以及横向股权转让和纵向股权转让之间的回报差异。研究发现,创业投资家在单方股权转让中可以得到比协同股权转让更高的投资回报,而且两者的差异在具有严重信息不对称的初创公司尤其明显。并且,横向股权转让可以获得比纵向股权转让更高的回报。然而,在创业资本市场繁荣时期,这个结果却是相反的。此外,研究发现有经验的创业投资家可以克服自身在股权转让中所处的劣势地位,从而在两种股权转让类型中得到较高水平的回报。This paper investigates how the relation between acquirer and target during shares transfer of venture capital backed company affects acquirer's return. The relation is classifi ed based on the number of acquirers and whether the acquirer and target are in the same industry. Using a proprietary dataset of 716 cases of shares transfers, we fi rst provide evidence that cases with unique buyer generate higher returns for acquirers, relative to cases with multiple buyers. And this effect is more pronounced in cases with higher levels of asymmetry information. We then show that acquirers from related industry gain better performance during normal market period, while they earn lower return during boom market period. Moreover, we suggest that experienced acquirers outperform in all types of shares transfers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43