历史建筑保护中“原真性”理论与实践的矛盾  

The Theoretical And Practical Contradiction About Authenticity In Historical Architectural Protection

作　　者：缪璇 杨雪松[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学城市设计学院

出　　处：《建筑与文化》2017年第4期54-56,共3页Architecture & Culture

摘　　要：随着国际对文化遗产保护制度的日益完善,后人对其中历史建筑保护的观念也逐渐开始重视。但在绝大多数实际案例中还是不难看出,实践的可操作性往往跟不上理论的步伐。本论文就东西方对"原真性"保护理解的不同而产生的差异为中心,结合理论和实践来说明此类现象及其成因,并以分析《中国文物古迹保护准则》中部分对原真性的保护理论,探讨其中存在的问题,以及指出目前国内对历史建筑的保护误区与其未来的发展。With the international cultural heritage protection system increasingly improving, people are beginning to pay more attention on the concept of protection of historic buildings. But in most cases it is not difficult to find the actual, practical operability often can not keep the pace of theory developing. This paper which is based on the different understanding of ＂authenticity＂ of conservation between East and West combined the theories and practice to explain such a phenomenon and its causes and analyzed the ＂Chinese cultural relics protection norms＂ in the section on the authenticity of protection theory.It discussed the existing problems, domestic protection of historic buildings and its future misunderstanding.

关 键 词：原真性 历史建筑 保与用 文化价值 

分 类 号：TU-87[艺术—艺术设计]