检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,武汉430072 [2]国家卫生计生委统计信息中心,北京100810
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2017年第5期79-81,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJCZH137);武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社会科学)(413000003)
摘 要:目的:研究我国卫生系统绩效的公平性,为我国卫生系统加强提供依据。方法:基于WHO卫生系统绩效评价框架,利用国家卫生服务调查扩点省份数据和相对集中指数方法,从地区、收入、教育等维度研究我国不同地区和省份的卫生系统绩效不平等。结果:我国卫生系统健康状况和满意度方面集中指数一般不超过0.1,而经济风险保护在各个维度的相对集中指数总体在0.2以上,处于相对较高的水平。结论:我国卫生系统绩效健康和满意度方面公平性较好,但是经济风险保护不平等问题突出;卫生系统绩效呈现出弱势人群脆弱性,低收入和受教育水平人群受到健康冲击更严重。国家和地区层面需要更多的关注贫困地区以及弱势人群,给予更多的健康管理和医疗保障支持。Objective: To Study the equity of Chinese health systems performance and provide evidence for strengthening health system. Methods: Based on WHO health systems performance evaluation framework, the provincial data of expanded pilots under the national health service investigation and relative concentration index (RCI) were used to study the inequality of Chinese health systems performance from regions, income and education, etc. Results: The RCI values were lower than 0.1 on health status and satisfaetion dimensions. The RCI of financial risks protection was higher than 0.2, which was at a respective higher level. Conclusion: The health performance of people with lower education and wealth were fragility and these people usually with health shocks. Therefore, the national and regional government should pay more attention on vulnerable group and provide more healthcare management and security support.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.190