检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新乡医学院心理学系,河南新乡453003 [2]西安交通大学管理学院,陕西西安710049 [3]西南财经大学学生工作部,四川成都611130
出 处:《情报科学》2017年第5期125-131,共7页Information Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71271166);河南省哲学社会科学基金项目(2015BSH016)
摘 要:【目的/意义】从复杂网络视角构建考虑关系强度的有界信任模型,分析网络集群行为的观点演化机制,以期为引导和化解网络集群行为提供指导。【方法/过程】基于网络社群用户观点演化规则,运用计算实验法分析网络结构、关系强度和意见领袖对网络集群行为主体观点演化的影响作用。【结果/结论】稀疏网络结构中的个体进行观点交互的对象较少,聚合需要的时间较少,有利于网络社群观点聚合;强关系更利于网络社群成员观点的快速聚合,且观点聚合达到稳态时的观点数量和观点分布方差均小于弱关系环境下;意见领袖在观点演化过程中发挥主导性作用,分散的群体观点最终朝向意见领袖所持的观点逐渐偏移。[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of complex networks, We build a bounded trust model to analyze the evolution of public opinion in the network community, in order to resolve the network public opinion crisis timely. [Method/process]The scale-free network was used to design the evolvement rule of user's view of network community. The simulation experiment is used to analyze the influence of network structure, relationship strength and opinion leaders on the evolution process of opinion opinion. [Conclusion/conclusion] We conclude that sparse network has less object interaction and less aggregation time, which is beneficial to the aggregation of viewpoints of network community; strong relationship is more favorable for rapid aggregation of viewpoints of network members, the number of opinions and the variance of opinion distribution are both smaller than those in weak relationship environment; opinion leaders play a dominant role in the evolu- tion of the view of the online community, and the divergent views of the group are gradually shifted towards the viewpoint held by opinion leaders.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200