Criticism of the Logic of the Ecological Imperialism of ＂Carbon Politics＂ and Its Transcendence  

作　　者：Huan Qingzhi 

机构地区：[1]School of Marxism, Peking University

出　　处：《Social Sciences in China》2017年第2期76-94,共19页中国社会科学（英文版）

摘　　要：Within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, international carbon politics inevitably presents itself as the logic or essence of ＂ecological imperialism,＂ reflecting a few Western countries＇ expansion and development of their historically formed international hierarchical superiority or exclusive hegemony on the basis of their domestic capitalist economies and politics. This is an intrinsic obstacle to creating a more equitable, democratic and effective global climate or environmental governance system. Criticism of international carbon politics and its ＂ecological imperialism,＂ based on traditional ＂green-left＂ theories from Marxist philosophy and political economy, provides a theoretical basis for seeking an alternative way to cope with global climate change effectively. As a responsible developing country, China＇s response to climate change is not only an internal requirement for the promotion of its own sustainable development, but also reflects its responsibility to create a community of shared future for mankind. This rationale for our time determines that it is necessary for China to become a world leader in coping with global climate change and environmental governance through a leadership which lies in making a contribution rather than fighting for hegemony.在《联合国气候变化框架公约》及《京都议定书》框架下，国际“碳政治”不可避免地呈现为“生态帝国主义”的逻辑或本质，是少数西方国家在其国内资本主义经济政治基础上，延续与拓展历史形成的国际等级化优势或排斥性霸权的表现，也是创建更加公平、民主与有效的全球气候或环境治理体制的内在性障碍。对国际“碳政治”及其“生态帝国主义”逻辑的揭示和批判，主要来自马克思主义哲学和政治经济学传统的“绿色左翼”理论资源，并为寻求有效应对全球气候变化的替代性路径提供了理论基础。作为负责任的发展中大国，中国应对气候变化既是推动本国可持续发展的内在需要，也是构建人类命运共同体的责任担当。这决定了中国成为全球气候变化应对或环境治理体系中世界性领导者的必然性时代理据在于做出贡献而不是争夺霸权。

关 键 词：Paris Agreement carbon politics ecological imperialism green-left theories socialist ecological civilization 

分 类 号：C[社会学]