检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宝双[1] 黄丽红[1] 宫海军[1] 任向鑫[1] 薛荣刚[1]
机构地区:[1]北方工程设计研究院有限公司,石家庄050011
出 处:《工业建筑》2017年第4期38-40,92,共4页Industrial Construction
摘 要:在地质情况复杂、土层起伏很大的湿陷性黄土场地,当建筑物变形控制要求较高,需全部消除场地湿陷性时,可采用不同夯击能进行强夯;当建筑物变形控制要求不高,仅需消除基础范围内的全部湿陷和基础范围外部分消除湿陷性时,可通过强夯消除室内地面的部分湿陷,采用强夯和挤密联合法完全消除基础下的地基土湿陷。通过方案对比,分析了两种方案的特点及其适用范围,结合实际工程可知,应调整湿陷性黄土含水量,以取得最佳的强夯效果。On the collapsible loess foundation with complicated geological conditions and rugged terrain, when the deformation control, requirement of the building is severe, different tamping energy can be adopted for dynamic consolidation to eliminate collapsibility completely; when the deformation foundation requirement of the building is not too severe, which needs to eliminate collapsibility of the under the base completely and eliminate collapsibility of other areas partly. Dynamic consolidation technique can be adopted to partly eliminate collapsibility of indoor floor while dynamic consoildation and ground compaction method can be adopted. The characteristics and scope of application of these two kinds of schemes could be analyzed through comparison, and by combining with practical engineering, the water content of collapsible loess could be adjusted to get the best compaction effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31