应用程序商店著作权侵权问题研究  

Study of the Problem of Copyright Infringement in Application Store

作　　者：吕凯[1] 李慧君[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院,天津300072

出　　处：《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第3期45-51,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划项目资助(TJFX15-006)

摘　　要：针对应用程序商店存在的著作权侵权问题,分析并对比安卓与苹果应用程序商店的商业经营模式,认为两者具有不同的法律属性:苹果应用程序商店更接近于网络交易平台,负有审查义务且不适用"避风港"原则,只能构成直接侵权;而安卓应用程序商店属于信息储存空间类的网络服务提供商,不负有审查义务且适用"避风港"原则,直接侵权行为与间接侵权行为并存;提出对应用版权的保护不仅要达到版权人、应用程序商店与公众三方之间的利益平衡,更要注重不同性质的应用程序商店在版权保护中所扮演的角色及应承担的责任。The problem of copyright infringement in application store is increasingly serious,and whether application store takes the tort responsibility as well as what kind of tort responsibility application store should bear are heatedly debated in the circle of academic and judicial practice. Android application store and Apple Store belong to different application platform in nature after analyzing their business management pattern. The openness of the source code of Android application store means that Android application store belongs to the information storage space of internet service provider,and meanwhile does not have the examination obligation as well as can apply the principle of Safe Harbor. However,Apple Store is more close to the internet trading platform based on its closure. Not only can it not apply the principle of Safe Harbor for liability defense,but also has the examination obligation. Apple Store can only pose a direct infringement,while Android application store can cause both direct infringement and indirect infringement,and needs to analyze and identify the subjective fault.

关 键 词：知识产权 商业经营 应用程序商店 苹果 安卓 著作权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学] D923.4[政治法律—法学]