检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐晶[1]
出 处:《中国民康医学》2017年第4期67-69,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:探讨小儿唇裂术后患儿最佳的护理方法。方法:将72例小儿唇裂患儿分为对照组和观察组,每组各36例。对两组患儿均通过整形手术治疗,但术后护理方法各异。对照组患儿采取传统的护理方法;观察组患儿进行综合护理干预。结果:从患儿住院阶段的情绪表现、术后出现并发症的情况和对护理满意度和效果进行评价,观察组患儿均取得更为理想的护理效果,与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。如在护理满意度方面,对照组和观察组患儿的护理满意度分别为69.44%和94.44%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对小儿唇裂患儿,术后进行综合护理干预,效果显著。Objective: To explore the best nursing methods forchildren with cleft lip after operation. Methods: 72 cleft lip children were randomly divided into observation group( n = 36) and control group( n = 36). All the children were given the plastic surgery treatment but received differentpostoperative care. The control group received the traditional nursing method,while the observation group accepted the comprehensive nursing intervention. Results: The nursing satisfaction and the effects of nursing care were evaluated from the emotional expressions of the children during hospitalization and postoperative complications. The nursing effects of the observation group were better than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant( P〈0. 05). The nursing satisfactions of the observation group and the control group were 94. 44% and 69. 44%,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusions: For the children with cleft lip,postoperative comprehensive nursing intervention has significant effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249