中国文化产业的行业效率比较及省域差异研究  

The Comparison of Efficiency of Cultural Sub-industry and Its Provincial Differences in China

作　　者：郭淑芬[1,2] 郭金花[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西财经大学资源型经济转型协同创新中心,山西太原030006 [2]山西财经大学管理科学与工程学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2017年第5期71-79,共9页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"我国文化产业创新绩效评价及其集群化对策"(教技函[2012]80号);国家社会科学基金项目"文化产业创新体系理论模型与实践比较"(12BGL132)

摘　　要：在区域经济转型的关键时期,文化制造业、文化批零业和文化服务业在各省市获得了不同程度的发展。通过构建测度指标体系,运用SBM-DEA模型和Malmquist指数测算发现:(1)中国内地文化产业三大子行业综合效率整体偏低,纯技术效率偏低是主要原因。行业效率的提升仍需依赖技术水平与管理能力提升;(2)31省市文化子行业效率水平非均衡特征明显:文化制造业综合效率呈现"西低东高"阶梯式分布,文化批零业和文化服务业则整体呈现"低集中—高分散"的空间分异特征。相比而言,多数省市文化制造业有了较好发展,这与中国制造业率先获得发展相关;(3)2012—2013年,文化制造业、文化批零业及文化服务业行业效率增幅最大的依次是中部、西部和东部地区,这体现了中国产业转移与文化产业差异化区域发展的阶段性特征。At the critical moment of regional economic transformation, the cuhure manufacture, retail and service industry in many provinces has developed diversely. The paper constructed an index system, and applied SBM-DEA and Malmquist model to measure the efficiency of cultural sub-industry. The results are as follows. （1）The comprehensive efficiency of sub-industry is low totally, and the low pure technical efficiency is the main reason. It relies on the improvement of technical level and management ability to promote efficiency. （2）Sub-industries efficiency exists unbalanced in spatial distribution： the culture manufacture shows ＂west low, east high＂, and it has gotten development in many provinces, which relates to the prior development of manufacture. The retail and services sub-industriesshow ＂low concentricity but high dispersion＂. （3）In 2012--2013, the sub-industry efficiency of culture manufacture, retail and serv- ice increasing most rapidly located in the central, west and east area in order, reflecting the phased characteristics of industrial transfer and differentiation of regional development.

关 键 词：文化产业 行业效率 SBM-DEA ARCGIS 省域差异 

分 类 号：G124[文化科学]