检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘惠明[1] 尹郝 LIU Hui-ming YIN Hao(College of law, Hehai University, Nanjing 211000, China)
机构地区:[1]河海大学法学院,南京211000
出 处:《经济研究导刊》2017年第11期195-199,共5页Economic Research Guide
摘 要:实践中,知识产权拒绝许可的情形并不少见。我国反垄断法规定可以对滥用知识产权以达到排除限制竞争目的的行为进行审查规制,因此如何判断和确定合理使用与滥用的界限就显得更加重要。对欧美国家在知识产权拒绝许可方面的反垄断法律与实践的了解与借鉴,有利于结合当前我国国情,树立正确理念,推进我国知识产权与反垄断法的发展。In the practice of intellectual property rights, refusal to license 1he situation is not uncommon. China's anti-monopoly law provisions to abuse of intellectual property rights in order to achieve the purpose of the act to eliminate or restrict competition review regulation, so how to judge and determine the reasonable use and abuse of the boundaries is more important. The European and American countries refused in the IPR antitrust the law and practice of licensing the understanding and reference, in favor of combining with the current situation of our country, to establish a correct concept, to promote the development of China's intellectual property rights and anti-monopoly law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222