基于“达标互动理论”的护理干预在剖宫产产妇康复中的应用  

The application of nursing intervention based on ＂interaction standard theory＂ in cesarean section maternal rehabilitation

作　　者：程琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]南阳医学高等专科学校护理系,473000

出　　处：《国际医药卫生导报》2017年第10期1489-1491,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News

基　　金：南阳市2015年科技发展计划项目（KJGG16）

摘　　要：目的探讨基于“达标互动理论”的护理干预在剖宫产产妇康复中的应用效果。方法选择2015年9月至2016年3月在本院接受剖宫产的60例产妇为对照组，2016年4月至10月的60例剖宫产产妇为观察组。对照组采用剖宫产后的传统护理方法，观察组采用基于“达标互动理论”的护理干预。比较两组产妇产后活动、肠道功能恢复情况、产后并发症及产妇满意率的差异。结果观察组下床、排气、排便时间均短于对照组（P〈0．05）；观察组产后出血、尿潴留、乳房胀痛发生率低于对照组（P〈0．05）；对照组满意率83．3％，观察组满意率93．3％，观察组对护理满意率高于对照组（P〈0．05）。结论基于“达标互动理论”的护理干预在剖宫产产妇的康复中具有促进作用，可以在医院推广。Objective To discuss the application effect of nursing intervention based on ＂interaction standard theory＂ in cesarean section matemal rehabilitation. Methods 60 puerperae who received cesarean section in our hospital from September 2015 to March 2016 were selected as control group, 60 puerperae who received cesarean section from April 2016 to October 2016 were selected as observation group. The control group received traditional nursing methods, while the observation group received nursing intervention based on ＂interaction standard theory＂. The postpartum activity, recovery process of intestinal function, postpartum complications, and the maternal satisfaction rate between the two groups were compared. Results The off-bed time, exhaust time, defecation time in observation group were shorter than those in control group （P〈0.05）, the incidences of postpartum hemorrhage, retention of urine, breast tenderness in observation group were lower than those in control group （P〈0.05）, the maternal satisfaction rate in observation group was higher than that in control group （93.3% vs. 83.3%, P〈0.05）. Conclusion Nursing intervention based on ＂interaction standard theory＂ has positive effect on cesarean section maternal rehabilitation, which can be promoted in hospitals.

关 键 词：达标互动理论 剖宫产 术后康复 

分 类 号：R473.71[医药卫生—护理学]