检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《运筹与管理》2017年第4期20-27,共8页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71172018;71302115);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13YJC630121);天津财经大学优秀青年学者资助计划;天津财经大学研究生科研资助计划(2015TCS28)
摘 要:论文将公平偏好引入商业信用供应链的运作中,研究公平偏好如何影响供应链的商业信用和定价策略。论文在三种情况下,即仅供应商关注公平,仅零售商关注公平和双方均关注公平,运用Stackelberg博弈分析了供应商的最优商业信用期及零售商的最优零售价格。研究发现,当零售商具有公平偏好时,零售价格与其公平偏好程度无关;零售商的公平偏好程度越大,供应商提供的商业信用期限越长。当仅供应商具有公平偏好时,供应商的公平偏好程度越大,零售商的零售价格越大,供应商提供的商业信用期限越短;当双方都具有公平偏好时,零售商的零售价格关于双方偏好均为增函数;供应商的商业信用期限为自身偏好系数的增函数,为零售商偏好系数的减函数。供应链成员的效用为自身偏好系数的增函数,对方偏好系数的减函数;双方具有公平偏好时,供应链利润小于无公平偏好时的供应链利润。The paper studies that how the fairness preferences affect trade credit and pricing strategy of supply chain considering the fairness preference. First, we build the decision models in three cases: the supplier with fairness preference, the retailer with fairness preference and both with the fairness preference. The paper analy- ses the optimal trade credit period of the supplier and the optimal retail price of the retailers adopting the Stackel- berg game. The study finds that when the retailer has the fairness preference, the retail price of retailer does not change with the degree of fairness preference; when the retailer have greater fairness preference, the credit term that supplier can provide is longer. In the case of only supplier having fairness preference, when the supplier have greater fairness preference, the retail price of retailer is lower, and the trade credit term that supplier can provide is shorter; in the case of both the sides have fairness preferences, the retail price is increasing with the preferences; the trade credit term that the supplier can provide is increasing with the preference coefficient of himself and is decreasing function on the preference coefficient of the retailers. The utility functions for the sup- ply chain members is increasing with its preference, and decreasing with the other' s preference coefficient; with both sides having fairness preference, the supply chain profit is less than the supply chain profit with no fairness preference.
关 键 词:供应链管理 定价 商业信用 STACKELBERG博弈 公平偏好
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43