检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏联合职业技术学院连云港中医药分院,江苏连云港222007
出 处:《中国药房》2017年第13期1845-1847,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较补骨脂盐炙品和盐蒸品中2种指标性成分的含量,筛选更优的炮制工艺。方法:在固定盐与药材质量比为1∶50、加水量为盐的4~5倍、盐水闷润时间为2 h的条件下,分别考察补骨脂在温度150、170、190℃下分别炒10、12、14 min的盐炙品和蒸制1、1.5、2、2.5 h后的盐蒸品中指标性成分补骨脂素和异补骨脂素的含量,比较两种炮制工艺的效果。结果:在固定条件下,指标成分的含量在盐炙品中以150℃下炒制12 min者最高,在盐蒸品中以蒸制1 h者最高;盐蒸品中的含量(1.49%)高于盐炙品(1.29%)(P=0.011)。结论:根据炮制品指标性成分含量的比较,补骨脂盐蒸法优于盐炙法。OBJECTIVE:To compare the contents of 2 index components in salt frying and salt steaming samples of Psoralea corylifolia,and select better processing technology. METHODS:Under the conditions that ratio of salt and medicinal materials was 1:50,4-5 times salt of adding water,brine run time was 2 h,the amounts of psoralen and isopsoralen in salt frying samples after 10,12,14 min of frying under 150 ℃,170 ℃,190 ℃ and in salt steaming samples after 1,1.5,2,2.5 h of steaming were re-spectively investigated,and the effects of 2 processing technology were compared. RESULTS:Under fixed condition,the contents of index components was the highest in salt frying samples by fried for 12 min under 150 ℃ and in salt steaming samples by steamed for 1 h;the content in salt steaming samples (1.49%) was higher than that in salt frying samples (1.29%)(P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS:According to the comparison of index components'contents in processing samples,salt steaming is superior to salt frying of P. corylifolia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38